Blog Information

• Posted By : Skyzhay Skyzhay
• Posted On : Sep 08, 2021
• Views : 182
• Category : Cooking Safety 101
• Description : Nothing was said by me about updates being bad. They have done well with a lot of the content which feels oldschool. Hosidius growth is perhaps the update we've ever had in that regard. What I dislike is that the idea of Jagex utilizing OSRS instead of timeline where they never screwed up RS2. I really don't think Runescape in its present state is like that, but things might change. They never anticipated OSRS getting the"main Runescape game" and surveys like this one make me incredibly suspicious with what they've been planning behind closed doors for the years ahead. I just wish to be able to play with the Old School without worrying about another fiasco that is RS3 that we have always known and loved. Eventually 1 day nobody will be able to play Runescape ever again. Sucks to consider. I hunted in this, I really believe that the polling in OSRS should be taken off. Nobody person speaks for everybody and if people simply vote for self interest or into spite othrrs, we WILL NEVER get anything rewarding. That is the reason the devs need to choose to make quests and cont quest lines. Skills are wanted by me, I need this game to grow. Polling just lets the neckbeards continue to deny new content to Runescape. The quantity of returning and new mid-high lvl players they get will readily off-balance the sober bank status minority they'll shed for a month till they resub again. RS3 is what occurs without consumer polling. The neighborhood picking what goes in Runescape signifies the playerbase wanted something and Runescape will not be pushed into the ground from aqful updates. One for everybody is the system you're proposing. Polling is the opinion of this userbase. It's everyone with a voice. The first question about frequently do I play this sport, there should be an option of,"I am now taking a break" That is fine. My issue is I suck at this game. I'm 1600 total but I'm not too efficient or combat focused so that I haven't bossed or completed master quests. So it didn't give me an option to say I don't understand in regards to these questions. I put neutral which I presume throws off the ethics of the response. Additionally when you're speaking about Jagex that I didn't have any clue how to answer those questions. I really don't understand anything about Jagex outside the OSRS team that I believe is a relatively small section of your company. In addition, I wish I knew anything about your parent firm MacArthur. They are a ghost at the internet. What's more, the only think I really do understand is that Jagex has pretty much given up on every game they've ever tried to make out of RuneScape. What the flying fuck did they do with MechScape/Stellar Dawn. Next was the question about prioritizing what I think you must come out having to maintain me as a paying member. There was no choice for updating skills or saying I don't need you to concentrate on a few of those choices in any way. Finally for the question,"what do you consider customer care?" An option ought to be,"What customer service? If you want to know more about can go https://www.rsgoldfast.com/"

Overview

• I work in market research and OSRS GP Qualtrics is a industry pillar. If you don't feel comfortable with Qualtrics I understand but my experience let's me think it's alright. So let's say I answered this poll 100% frankly, who'd you envision gets that data? After GDPR I have felt so pressured with every single site ever to track and monitor me it's disgusting, and even disgusting that it was happening before without my knowledge. Taking a look at the survey link and the fundamental disclosures in the bottom of the webpage it does not appear the Jagex is using a third party fielding company so if the only men and women who would have direct access to your information would be the survey developers who will pull exports out of the database to distribute internally. EU also includes some fairly strong data privacy legislation that (at least my US based firm which frequently interacts with Qualtrics links) are followed pretty strictly from the survey developers and information hosting websites.
  
  After running through the survey Jagex definitely is apparently running solo on this one. No third party firm would allow participants directly enter in their own contact info (because it would mean they would lose your business to their customer [not a nefarious thing]) and the only area I found kinda strange was the phone number request in the end. I would have substituted that with a check box for recontacting and pipe-in the email that you could optionally have set in earlier for affirmation. I think you are fine answering this survey when you have privacy issues because essentially all information is unknown and it's using an industry-standard system of Qualtrics. Jagex probably does not have market research ISO certificates but this is a fast annual survey so they wouldn't have to have any.
  
  It is my hope that this feedback encourages the team to make surveys more concentrated to the audience who knowingly take part in the content they are polling, or use them as an advisory tool rather than a judgment. It'd be interesting if they reveal some of the outcomes of the survey. I answered the opposite, that polling is in the crux of OSRS and they need to stick with it. For clarity, I answered that polling is in the core of OSRS. The survey system enables the whole playerbase to open freeform discussion on the proposed changes/additions created to Runescape itself and it's absolutely a great way to gather feedback and people opinion on something. With that said, I really don't believe the current format meets the best interests of Runescape.
  
  I don't believe that the participant base is good at determining which material, based on objective merit, is good for integrity and the overall health of Runescape long term. According to polling, the community enjoyed 6hr NMZ but it was important to remove despite that, which Jagex did. Players do not vote for any changes that make things tougher for them but over time that becomes a negative as content becomes simpler and achievements are diluted, these are very minor but readily add up.
  
  Another illustration is PK and PvP related adjustments that are voted against. People even voted against letting pures wear chaps. The only impact of the to accounts would have been to slightly increase the demand and therefore improve profits from hint scrolls. This isn't an example of polling meeting with the interests of Runescape, it's only a meme of not enjoying pures. If we only see updates that suit the same 75 percent of individuals every time the remaining 25 percent become increasingly marginalised, which isn't a good balance when people 75/25 are apparently so often the very same people.
  
  I mean thats how voting works buy 2007 runescape gold irl. Not everyone is going to make sound decisions while voting, or make the"right" choice. If literally everyone left the most educated, most informed voting choices. The United States wouldn't have. Nothing more, real world example of unemployment. Our voting system isn't ideal, but we all have to ensure we do not wind up pushed RS3 players down. Our throats. There are definitely improves that could be made that do not undermine it though (which aren't being achieved or tried ).